(Courtesy: NY Times) |
Jeff Klein, who runs the Senate's Independent Democratic Conference, pushed the NYDA to the floor for a vote without passage. The chances of any survival for it to be passed were up in the air. The bill failed 30-29, two votes shy of 32 required to pass. Democrats needed two of the 28 Republicans to jump ship to obtain their goal. Not only did that not happen, but two Democrat senators voted against the NYDA. The two Democrats were one from Rochester who sits with the Democrat caucus, while the one from Brooklyn sits with the Republican caucus.
Republican
Senators cited fiscal impact and the language of the bill for the reasons of every
Republican to voted no. Some Republicans argued the proposal would use state
taxpayer money to help families not following immigration laws while others also argued that legal constituents
are in need for TAP assistance first. If the NYDA would have passed, State
Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli estimated that it would cost over $20 million to
cover for financial assistance, breaking down to about $5,000 a year per student enrolled.
NYDA's failure shows weakness by Governor Andrew Cuomo, who could have made this bill a priority like he did with the SAFE Act. He even could have calling for a special election for the two vacant Senate seats earlier in the year - those
two votes could have tipped the scales and NYDA would have been signed into law.
But where was the leadership? With a weak Democrat senate that lacks commitment to enact resolutions they preach from the back benches and a tenuous "majority" coalition, a leader would have cobbled together support to reach his goal.
But where was the leadership? With a weak Democrat senate that lacks commitment to enact resolutions they preach from the back benches and a tenuous "majority" coalition, a leader would have cobbled together support to reach his goal.
Democratic weakness translates into a better chance for the Republicans to
retain (or, take back as it were) control of the Senate and possibly the Governor's mansion. Republicans can use
the "yes" votes against upstate Democrat as making yet another empty promise that led to failure.
The Senators who voted against the NYDA actually understand the term "illegal" and those "illegal" immigrants don’t vote because they cannot. Why should
legislators reward
illegal behavior? Having NY residents paying excessive taxes to reward people
for breaking the law doesn't make sense - especially when children of citizen struggle - they deserve to achieve the "dream".
No comments:
Post a Comment